Friday, April 24, 2009

Song Analysis

locked="false" priority="67" semihidden="false" unhidewhenused="false" name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4">

The Why of Y

Mike Krause

For the song that best represents the “echo boom” or “Generation Y” I chose one that acknowledges what our reputation is and how they are viewed. The Generation Y is commonly seen as the “Apathetic Generation”, a bunch of kids who don’t care. The song I chose openly addresses the labels and negative aspects of the generation, but then defends them. In my opinion, John Mayer’s “Waiting on the World to Change” best represents our generation.

In the song, Mayer recognizes what Generation Y is viewed as, but argues that it is not them who are apathetic; it is the older generations that are oppressive. He’s saying it’s not necessarily that they don’t care; it’s just that the generations older than them, with more power won’t allow them to fight or stand up for what they believe. As he says “now we see everything that's going wrong/with the world and those who lead it/we just feel like we don't have the means/to rise above and beat it. They are forced to live in the shadow of the people in power. If they are constantly kept quiet, our opinions ignored, it will come off as apathy, even though it isn’t. Like he says, “We’re all misunderstood.”

The only thing that generation Y is left to do is “keep waiting/waiting on the world to change. When they see something that needs to be changed, when they have a cause to fight for, they shoot them down, remove our say and continue on complaining about our ineptitude and complacency.

They say we stand for nothing and/there's no way we ever could.” It’s impossible to say that anyone stands for nothing. How can’t you have anything to stand for? John is saying in this song that that his generation is grossly misjudged and wronged. They have been stomped on and had our ideas thrown back in our faces, left to wonder why they spoke up in the first place. If everything the young people of a nation think and say goes unanswered or ignored, how can the current power-holders expect them to develop or grow as a culture, nation or population?

An example of how the government tromped on our ideas is the War in Iraq. Although there may have been original support for the war, the kids who had to fight it quickly realised that they didn’t believe in what they were now fighting for. Unfortunately their opinions mean nothing, and off to war they went. John Mayer’s song is almost a plea as much as a defence. Of course they care and of course they do want things to change for the better, our opinions are just ignored. They have many causes and opinions, but as long as the people in power disagree, what good does that do? If the youth were given power to do anything, they would bring home the soldiers and end a meaningless war. Because they can’t cancel the war, and they don’t openly agree with it, the media and influences jump to the conclusion that they don’t care. And if you are the ones in control, you can say whatever you please. “Now if we had the power /to bring our neighbours home from war/they would have never missed a Christmas /no more ribbons on their door/ and when you trust your television/what you get is what you got/cause when they own the information, oh /they can bend it all they want.” What John is asking here, I feel, is for the people not to believe all the politics. Just because it is said that generation Y doesn’t care, doesn’t actually mean that they don’t. Although there is a great chance that the generation will get into the age of power and not change a thing, but right now the ideals and aspirations are alive, just unable to fly, so hold your judgements until after they’ve achieved power. “One day our generation/is gonna rule the population”

Until that day comes, however John sees it as a simple waiting game. His generation can’t speak up due to the fact that they are being silenced, and the only thing left to do is wait until they do actually have a voice. Unfortunately this waiting comes off as not actually caring, and John again pleads with the listeners to understand: “it's not that we don't care, we just know that the fight ain't fair,” He argues that generation Y is not apathetic and non-caring, they just have the odds stacked way against them, and their voices are stifled. The only way to get their voice heard is to wait until they are the ones in control, or the current powers open up and listen.

John Mayer- Waiting on the World to Change

me and all my friends
we're all misunderstood
they say we stand for nothing and
there's no way we ever could
now we see everything that's going wrong
with the world and those who lead it
we just feel like we don't have the means
to rise above and beat it

so we keep waiting
waiting on the world to change
we keep on waiting
waiting on the world to change

it's hard to beat the system
when we're standing at a distance
so we keep waiting
waiting on the world to change
now if we had the power
to bring our neighbours home from war
they would have never missed a Christmas
no more ribbons on their door
and when you trust your television
what you get is what you got
cause when they own the information, oh
they can bend it all they want

that's why we're waiting
waiting on the world to change
we keep on waiting
waiting on the world to change

it's not that we don't care,
we just know that the fight ain't fair
so we keep on waiting
waiting on the world to change

and we're still waiting
waiting on the world to change
we keep on waiting waiting on the world to change
one day our generation
is gonna rule the population
so we keep on waiting
waiting on the world to change

Thursday, March 26, 2009

The Baby Boom's Aftershock

Today in class I was relieved to find that we would discuss a topic that was quite interesting to me, and thus makes my journal writing assignment much easier. Today we read and discussed articles regarding the baby boomers and their "shockwave" effect, if you will on our society. The effects of baby boomers on our society are both negative and positive. In the article that I read, The Aging City, I read how the baby boomers, who are soon to be seniors, will drastically out-populate the younger population.
In just ten years, most of the Baby Boomer wave will be seniors, and the cities will have a huge dilemma to face. The seniors who want to continue to function in a society are presented with obstacles; one such being driving. If the seniors, who will inevitably suffer from age-related illnesses, become less able to drive a car, then isn’t it the government’s responsibility to step in and revoke the licence of incapable drivers? If this happens, however, then there are suddenly numerous amounts of elderly people who need assistance from someone younger and more capable, i.e. public transit. The cities can’t just make a bus go to every single seniors house, but without a service like that, they will not be able to go to a grocery store or other such place. So it boils down to a major decision. Should a city cater to the elderly and build new forms of public transit, and the young people be forced to help the old carry on, or should the door just be shut on the seniors, as the city adopts a “survival of the fittest” mentality? Neither sounds good to me, but something has to be done. And right now, no reasonable solutions presenting themselves.
थे बेबी बूम'स अफ्तेर्शोच्क
टुडे इन क्लास इ वास रेलिएवेद तो फंड ठाट वे वौल्ड दिस्कुस्स अ टोपिक ठाट वास कुइते इन्तेरेस्तिंग तो में, एंड ठूस मेक्स माय जर्नल व्रितिंग अस्सिग्न्मेंट मच एअसिएर. टुडे वे रीड एंड दिस्कुस्सेद अर्तिक्लेस रेगार्डिंग थे बेबी बूमेर्स एंड ठिर "शोच्क्वावे" इफेक्ट, इफ यू विल ओं ओउर सोसाइटी. थे एफ्फेक्ट्स ऑफ़ बेबी बूमेर्स ओं ओउर सोसाइटी अरे बोथ नेगेटिव एंड पोसितिवे. इन थे अर्तिक्ले ठाट इ रीड, थे एजिंग सिटी, इ रीड हाउ थे बेबी बूमेर्स, व्हो अरे सून तो बे सेनिओर्स, विल द्रस्तिकाल्ली आउट-पोपुलाते थे यौन्गेर पोपुलेशन.
इन जुस्त तें येअर्स, मोस्ट ऑफ़ थे बेबी बूमेर वाव विल बे सेनिओर्स, एंड थे सितिएस विल हवे अ ह्यूज दिलेम्मा तो फस. थे सेनिओर्स व्हो वांट तो कोन्तिनुए तो फुन्च्शन इन अ सोसाइटी अरे प्रेसेंतेद विथ ओब्स्ताक्लेस; ओने सुच बीइंग ड्राइविंग. इफ थे सेनिओर्स, व्हो विल इनेविताब्ली सुफ्फेर फ्रॉम आगे-रेलातेद इल्ल्नेस्सेस, बेकोमे लेस अबले तो ड्राइव अ कार, थें इसं’टी आईटी थे गवर्नमेंट’स रेस्पोंसिबिलिटी तो स्टेप इन एंड रेवोके थे लाइसेंस ऑफ़ इन्कापब्ले द्रिवेर्स? इफ थिस हप्पेंस, होवेवर, थें तेरे अरे सुद्देंली नुमेरौस अमौंट्स ऑफ़ एल्देर्ल्य पीपुल व्हो नीद अस्सिस्तांस फ्रॉम सोमोने यौन्गेर एंड मोरे कापबले, इ.ऐ. पब्लिक ट्रांसिट. थे सितिएस कैन’टी जुस्त मके अ बस गो तो एवेरी सिंगल सेनिओर्स हाउस, बुत विथौत अ सर्विस लिखे ठाट, थे विल नोट बे अबले तो गो तो अ ग्रोसरी स्टोर और ओथेर सुच प्लेस. सो आईटी बोइल्स दोवं तो अ मजोर डिसीजन. शौल्ड अ सिटी कटर तो थे एल्देर्ल्य एंड बिल्ड न्यू फोरम्स ऑफ़ पब्लिक ट्रांसिट, एंड थे यौंग पीपुल बे फोर्स्ड तो हेल्प थे ओल्ड कैरी ओं, और शौल्ड थे दूर जुस्त बे शूट ओं थे सेनिओर्स, अस थे सिटी अदोप्ट्स अ “सुर्विवल ऑफ़ थे फित्तेस्ट” मेंटालिटी? नेइठेर सौन्ड्स गुड तो में, बुत सोमेथिंग हस तो बे दोने. एंड रिघ्त नो, नो रेअसोनाब्ले सोलुशंस प्रेसेंतिंग ठेम्सेल्वेस.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

An Inconvenient Tale of Two Farms

There have always been problems within society, and how it functions. Granted, there are some good things too, but we don’t feel a need to change those. How do we change though? For quite some time society viewed it as acceptable for women not to have rights. Now we see this as inhumane and unjust, but how did we get to that point? The simple answer is by studying our society and how it functions.

When I read “A Tale of Two Farms” and watched “An Inconvenient Truth”, I was stricken with grief. Mostly because I had to begin writing my journal about the afore-mentioned items, but some came from what I saw and read. Although I generally dislike Al Gore, and everything that he has done or is still currently doing, his movie has a point. Whether or not he is completely accurate or right in his assumptions, the world is going down the tubes. We live life on whims, buying giant SUVs that pump CO2 into the air, and having factories that do the same, just on a larger scale. Like I said before, I do not like Al Gore, and found that the movie, “An Inconvenient Truth”, was annoying at best, I will give him credit for doing something that few others dare to do. With the exception of David Suzuki, I have seen no other person openly profess the dire situation of global warming aside from Mr. Gore. For this he deserves a big high five. He did what is necessary; studied our society, found something wrong with it, and tried to remedy the problem. He has made it a “cool” thing to drive a hybrid, or buy energy efficient light bulbs. He did have help promoting this cause through other organizations and companies, but he made the initial move, and “opened the floodgates”, so to speak. This is what societies need in order to prosper, or for that matter, survive. If we do not turn around the microscope and look at ourselves, how can we expect to see a problem, let alone fix it?

Such is the case in Norse Greenland, nearly 500 hundred years ago. (Collapse, Jared Diamond) If the Norse society had looked at itself and how it functioned, it would have been able to change or tweak some things to survive, or at least attempt to survive. We do not, however, have to limit our studies to present day society. It would not be very helpful to see a problem in our society, but have no knowledge on how to make it better. This is when looking to the past helps us. As Jared Diamond says in “Collapse”,
“The past offers us a rich database from which we can learn, in order that we may keep on succeeding.” (Pg.3 Collapse)

If we do not look at past societies and how they either failed or succeeded, and compare that to our own societies, how can we ever expect to do any better ourselves?

Followers